Skip to content
MMS Advocates

LAPSSET and Private Capital Investment: Legal and Strategic Considerations

Abigael Chilango··3 min read

The LAPSSET Corridor Project (Lamu Port–South Sudan–Ethiopia Transport Corridor) stands as one of the most significant infrastructure initiatives in East Africa, presenting substantial opportunities for private capital participation. As Kenya continues to position itself as a regional logistics and trade hub, the project offers an attractive entry point for investors seeking long-term, infrastructure-backed returns. However, any such investment must be approached with a clear understanding of the legal and regulatory framework governing public-private partnerships in Kenya.

At the core of private sector participation in LAPSSET is the Public Private Partnerships Act, 2021, which provides the legal foundation for collaboration between government entities and private investors. The Act establishes a structured process through which projects are identified, appraised, procured, and implemented, ensuring transparency, accountability, and value for money. It also creates institutional mechanisms that investors must engage with throughout the lifecycle of a project.

A key institution in this framework is the Public Private Partnerships Directorate, which operates under the National Treasury and is responsible for overseeing the development and implementation of PPP projects. The Directorate plays a central role in project approval, standard-setting, and ensuring compliance with statutory requirements. For investors, early engagement with this body is critical in understanding project feasibility and regulatory expectations.

In addition, sector-specific agencies such as the LAPSSET Corridor Development Authority are responsible for project origination and coordination. These agencies act as contracting authorities and are the primary counterparts for private investors. They are involved in procurement processes and the negotiation of project agreements.

The PPP Act provides for several investment models, allowing flexibility in structuring transactions. These include Build Operate Transfer, Build Own Operate, Design Build Finance Operate, and concession arrangements. The choice of model will depend on the nature of the project, risk allocation preferences, and financing considerations. In all cases, the contractual framework will define key issues such as revenue mechanisms, tariff structures, performance obligations, and termination rights.

Procurement under the PPP regime is generally conducted through a competitive bidding process, although the law also permits privately initiated proposals under specific conditions. Investors considering unsolicited proposals must ensure compliance with strict procedural requirements, including demonstrating project uniqueness and value addition. This route, while potentially advantageous, is subject to rigorous scrutiny by the relevant authorities.

From a legal risk perspective, several considerations arise. Land acquisition remains a critical issue, particularly for large-scale infrastructure projects. Investors must ensure that acquisition processes comply with constitutional protections on property rights and are supported by lawful compensation mechanisms. Failure to do so may expose projects to litigation and delays.

Environmental compliance is equally significant. Projects within the LAPSSET corridor are subject to environmental impact assessments and licensing by the National Environment Management Authority. Investors are expected to adhere not only to domestic environmental laws but also to international best practices, particularly where financing involves multilateral institutions.

Dispute resolution is another important aspect of PPP agreements. The Kenyan framework allows for a range of mechanisms, including negotiation, mediation, and arbitration. International arbitration is commonly preferred in large infrastructure projects, providing investors with a neutral forum for resolving disputes. The inclusion of clear dispute resolution clauses is essential in mitigating legal uncertainty.

Furthermore, investors must consider fiscal and sovereign risks. PPP agreements often include government support measures such as guarantees, viability gap funding, or tax incentives. However, these must be carefully negotiated and documented to ensure enforceability. Stability clauses may also be included to protect investors against adverse changes in law or policy over the duration of the project.

In my view, the LAPSSET Corridor presents a compelling opportunity for private capital investment, but success in this space depends on a thorough appreciation of the legal environment. The PPP framework in Kenya is well-developed and continues to evolve, offering both structure and flexibility for investors. With proper legal due diligence, strategic structuring, and proactive engagement with regulatory authorities, private capital firms can effectively participate in and benefit from one of the region’s most transformative infrastructure programmes.

Bring us the facts.

We will tell you what the law does with them.